Head to head · updated 2026-08-01

Dentrix Ascend vs Denticon

The two serious DSO platforms. Both are cloud, so the hosting decision is not what separates them.

Dentrix Ascend

Henry Schein One

Henry Schein One’s cloud platform, aimed at DSOs and growth-focused groups.

Deployment
Cloud
Entry price
Not published
Built for
2–4 locations, Group, DSO / enterprise
Visit Dentrix Ascend(opens in a new tab)

Read the full Dentrix Ascend review

Denticon

Planet DDS

Enterprise cloud platform built specifically for DSOs and multi-location groups.

Deployment
Cloud
Entry price
Not published
Built for
Group, DSO / enterprise
Visit Denticon(opens in a new tab)

Read the full Denticon review

The short answer

Neither Dentrix Ascend nor Denticon publishes a price, so any cost comparison between them depends entirely on the quotes you negotiate.

Choose Dentrix Ascend if…

Groups and DSOs that want cloud and multi-location reporting from an established vendor.

It is ahead on native imaging, eprescribing, teledentistry, ai features .

Choose Denticon if…

DSOs and groups above roughly five locations that need centralised control and reporting.

It is ahead on open api .

Where they actually differ

Of 19 modules we track, these 5 differ. The rest match, so they are not what should decide it.

ModuleDentrix AscendDenticon
Native imaging Built in Via integration
ePrescribing Built in Via integration
Teledentistry Paid add-on Not stated
AI features Built in Via integration
Open API Via integration Built in
Show all 19 modules, including where they match
ModuleDentrix AscendDenticon
Scheduling Built in Built in
Clinical charting Built in Built in
Perio charting Built in Built in
Native imaging Built in Via integration
Billing Built in Built in
Claims Built in Built in
Insurance eligibility Built in Built in
Payments Built in Built in
Patient messaging Built in Built in
Online booking Built in Built in
Digital forms Built in Built in
Recall / reactivation Built in Built in
Analytics & KPIs Built in Built in
ePrescribing Built in Via integration
Teledentistry Paid add-on Not stated
AI features Built in Via integration
Open API Via integration Built in
Multi-location Built in Built in
Orthodontics Built in Built in

Pricing, side by side

Dentrix Ascend

No published pricingchecked 2026-08-01

Dentrix Ascend does not publish a price. You have to request a quote, which means you cannot budget or compare before speaking to a salesperson. Quote-only. Repackaged into new tiers in 2026 around an integrated platform architecture.

We do not repeat third-party price estimates for quote-only vendors. Several widely republished figures in this category turned out to belong to a different product — see how we compare.

Denticon

No published pricingchecked 2026-08-01

Denticon does not publish a price. You have to request a quote, which means you cannot budget or compare before speaking to a salesperson. Quote-only, negotiated per organisation and location count.

We do not repeat third-party price estimates for quote-only vendors. Several widely republished figures in this category turned out to belong to a different product — see how we compare.

Strengths and trade-offs

Dentrix Ascend

Strengths

  • True cloud with no server to own, from the vendor most US practices already trust.
  • Multi-location roll-ups and cross-location reporting are native.
  • Added orthodontics, voice-driven perio charting and expanded eligibility verification in mid-2026.

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing.
  • It is not Dentrix — the workflows differ, so migrating from on-premise Dentrix is a retrain, not an upgrade.
  • Feature parity with desktop Dentrix is still incomplete in places.

Denticon

Strengths

  • Built for many locations from the ground up — centralised reporting and roll-ups are native, not add-ons.
  • SOC 2 Type 2 certified, which matters for enterprise procurement.
  • Voice perio charting and a mature orthodontic module.

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing, and enterprise contracts are the norm.
  • Overkill for a single-location practice — you pay for scale you will not use.
  • Imaging relies on integration rather than a native module.

Other comparisons